翻訳と辞書 ・ Pike Township, Knox County, Ohio
・ Pike Township, Livingston County, Illinois
・ Pike Township, Lyon County, Kansas
・ Pike Township, Madison County, Ohio
・ Pike Township, Marion County, Indiana
・ Pike Township, Muscatine County, Iowa
・ Pike Township, Ohio
・ Pike Township, Ohio County, Indiana
・ Pike Township, Pennsylvania
・ Pike Township, Perry County, Ohio
・ Pike Township, Potter County, Pennsylvania
・ Pike Township, St. Louis County, Minnesota
・ Pike Township, Stark County, Ohio
・ Pike Township, Warren County, Indiana
・ Pike Transit Initiative
・ Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
・ Pike Whin Bog
・ Pike's Cantonment Site
・ Pike's Lane
・ Pike's moray eel
・ Pike's Peak (album)
・ Pike's Peak Country
・ Pike's Peak Gold Rush
・ Pike's Peak Grange No. 163
・ Pike's Stockade
・ Pike, California
・ Pike, Illinois
・ Pike, Indiana
・ Pike, New Hampshire
・ Pike, New York
|
|
| Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
''Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.'', 397 U.S. 137 (1970), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that power of states to pass laws interfering with interstate commerce is limited when the law poses an undue burden on businesses.
==Background==
An Arizona statute required that Arizona-grown cantaloupes advertise their state of origin on each package. Church was an Arizona grower of high quality cantaloupes. Instead of packing them in Arizona, it transported them to nearby California facilities, where they were not labeled as grown in Arizona.
Arizona issued an order prohibiting Church from shipping uncrated cantaloupes from the Arizona ranch, and requiring that the cantaloupes be packed in Arizona and identified as coming from an Arizona packer. This would have cost Church $200,000 to pack a $700,000 crop.〔(Full Text on Justia )〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|